<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Informational Meeting on Sunday, Nov. 8 between services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pastorontheloose.com/2009/11/informational-meeting-on-sunday-nov-8-between-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pastorontheloose.com/2009/11/informational-meeting-on-sunday-nov-8-between-services/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:29:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.pastorontheloose.com/2009/11/informational-meeting-on-sunday-nov-8-between-services/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pastorontheloose.com/?p=142#comment-52</guid>
		<description>It’s time for questions and answers regarding the resolutions.  What would be a reasonable time frame for determining if a relationship meets the “lifelong” criteria as expressed in resolutions 1, 2 and 4?  I think the language in the resolutions is deliberately vague.
	Attendance at the meeting was approximately 80 members (at least 5 of those were college students).  I heard you ask for questions regarding the resolutions and I think in order to be productive we need to stick to that narrow focus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s time for questions and answers regarding the resolutions.  What would be a reasonable time frame for determining if a relationship meets the “lifelong” criteria as expressed in resolutions 1, 2 and 4?  I think the language in the resolutions is deliberately vague.<br />
	Attendance at the meeting was approximately 80 members (at least 5 of those were college students).  I heard you ask for questions regarding the resolutions and I think in order to be productive we need to stick to that narrow focus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
